Wikipedia
Search Wikipedia:

Latest topics
» analytical chemistry
Today at 7:37 am by davink67

» redox reactions
Yesterday at 8:24 pm by scissors

» trends in periodic table groups
Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:03 pm by shelpey

» bond angles
Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:45 pm by chris

» sigma and pi bonds
Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:45 pm by chris

» When magnesium hydroxide and HCI are mixed together, magnesium chloride and water are formed. In a particular reaction, 25.0 g of each reaction are used.
Thu Nov 12, 2009 4:48 pm by xo6soccerqto6x

» inorganic chemistry
Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:03 pm by hafizata

» SCIENCE QS
Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:25 pm by bfrsoccer

» SCIENCE QS
Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:24 pm by japeitiatia

November 2009
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Calendar Calendar

Free Hit Counter

AMC 10, question 15

Post new topic   Reply to topic

View previous topic View next topic Go down

AMC 10, question 15

Post  karooomph on Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:05 am

Odell and Kershaw run for 30 minutes on a circular track. Odell runs clockwise at 250 m/min and uses the inner lane with a radius of 50 meters. Kershaw runs counterclockwise at 300 m/min and uses the outer lane with a radius of 60 meters, starting on the same radial line as Odell. How many times after the start do they pass each other?




btw, if anyone knows a good website with full solutions to these kind of contests, please post.

karooomph

Posts: 73
Join date: 2008-11-20
Age: 14
Location: ubseikastan

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: AMC 10, question 15

Post  bfrsoccer on Sun Feb 08, 2009 2:52 pm

I found this website, which contains solutions to past AMC 10 problems, but it might not have the solutions to the problems you're looking for (it only has up to 2008, and I'm guessing you took was in 2009).

This turned out to be a pretty cool problem.

First, I thought I'd model model each of their paths, with x1 representing the x-direction path of Odell and x2 representing the x-direction path of Kershaw.

To do this, I needed to convert the rates to appropriate forms. 250m/min * 1lap/(2pi*50m) = 5/(2pi)laps/min; 300m/min * 1lap/(2pi*60m) = 5/(2pi)laps/min (having taken some chemistry helps me to do conversions like this because it makes me think in terms of cancelling and multiplying units). Both of their rates are conveniently 5/(2pi)laps/min, except in opposite directions.

So, I have x1=-50cos(5/(2pi) * 2pi * t); x2=60cos(5/(2pi) * 2pi * t) (I multiply by 2pi afterwards because cosine already has a period of 2pi) - or, x1=-50cos(5t) x2=60cos(5t). At this point, I figured it'd be easier to model the entire thing in polar coordinates, giving: r1=50, θ1=-5t; r2=60, θ2=-5t. We want to find when measurements of the angles are equal (and note that even though the values of θ1 and θ2 won't be equal in this case except when t=0, the angles they represent will still periodically be equal, like how the angle represented by -5*2pi the angle represented by 5*2pi).

Then, by just thinking about the movement of their paths, you can tell that they will pass each other 2 times every lap (once on each opposite side of their paths). Each also runs 5 laps per every multiple of 2pi*t. They run 30 minutes, giving: (30*5*2)/(2pi)~=47.75. You can't really partially pass somebody, so the final answer is 47 times.

bfrsoccer
Administrator

Posts: 61
Join date: 2008-11-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: AMC 10, question 15

Post  funion987 on Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:04 pm


_________________
Vote in the latest poll here.

funion987
Administrator

Posts: 140
Join date: 2008-11-09

View user profile http://chemistry.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: AMC 10, question 15

Post  karooomph on Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:50 pm

funion, the pi symbol looks like an n. Any way to change this?

thanks

karooomph

Posts: 73
Join date: 2008-11-20
Age: 14
Location: ubseikastan

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: AMC 10, question 15

Post  funion987 on Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:22 pm

Well, I guess I could change the default font of the forums, which is the reason that it does look like an n, but I don't think that would work out so well. I forgot about the n thing.

_________________
Vote in the latest poll here.

funion987
Administrator

Posts: 140
Join date: 2008-11-09

View user profile http://chemistry.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: AMC 10, question 15

Post  karooomph on Sun Feb 08, 2009 9:00 pm

bfrsoccer wrote:I found this website, which contains solutions to past AMC 10 problems, but it might not have the solutions to the problems you're looking for (it only has up to 2008, and I'm guessing you took was in 2009).


thanks, the question was 2006, so I was was able to find it. Plus, you gave a detailed solution, so thanks!

karooomph

Posts: 73
Join date: 2008-11-20
Age: 14
Location: ubseikastan

View user profile

Back to top Go down

bfr's solution revised (it's just easier to read for me)

Post  karooomph on Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:32 am

I found this website, which contains solutions to past AMC 10 problems, but it might not have the solutions to the problems you're looking for (it only has up to 2008, and I'm guessing you took was in 2009).

This turned out to be a pretty cool problem.

First, I thought I'd model model each of their paths, with x1 representing the x-direction path of Odell and x2 representing the x-direction path of Kershaw.

To do this, I needed to convert the rates to appropriate forms. 250m/min * 1 lap/(2π*50m) = 5/(2π) laps/min; 300m/min * 1 lap/(2π*60m) = 5/(2π) laps/min (having taken some chemistry helps me to do conversions like this because it makes me think in terms of cancelling and multiplying units). Both of their rates are conveniently 5/(2π) laps/min, except in opposite directions.

So, I have x1= -50cos(5/(2π) * 2π* t); x2= 60cos(5/(2π) * 2π * t) (I multiply by 2π afterwards because cosine already has a period of 2π) - or, x1= -50cos(5t) x2=60cos(5t). At this point, I figured it'd be easier to model the entire thing in polar coordinates, giving: r1=50, θ1= -5t; r2= 60, θ2= -5t. We want to find when measurements of the angles are equal (and note that even though the values of θ1 and θ2 won't be equal in this case except when t= 0, the angles they represent will still periodically be equal, like how the angle represented by -5*2π the angle represented by 5*2π).

Then, by just thinking about the movement of their paths, you can tell that they will pass each other 2 times every lap (once on each opposite side of their paths). Each also runs 5 laps per every multiple of 2π*t. They run 30 minutes, giving: (30*5*2)/(2π)~= 47.75. You can't really partially pass somebody, so the final answer is 47 times.

karooomph

Posts: 73
Join date: 2008-11-20
Age: 14
Location: ubseikastan

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


Post new topic   Reply to topic
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum